Just a quick link to my monthly e-letter. This one is a bit different. I look at four (of many possible) scenarios for business after
For some reason I can’t understand, Mr. Skeptical Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg keeps getting space in places like the Wall Street Journal and Time to peddle
A couple posts ago, I talked about the ways you can use green data — footprinting information on your products and services up and down
Yesterday was a sad anniversary — it’s been 25 years since the Bhopal disaster raised the specter of chemicals and toxics as a deadly serious
If you put an energy meter inside a home and show people total usage in real time, a miraculous thing happens: they use about 10 percent less energy. The simple act of placing data in front of people changes their behavior. Data makes people smarter and inspires them to make small changes to save money and energy. You can use this powerful tool in business not only to cut costs, but to drive innovation and revenues.
The anger and energy of the climate skeptics is at a fever pitch lately. The breaking story that the Wall Street Journal loves so much
Contrary to the popular misconception that going green is expensive, in a very large range of cases, environmental initiatives don’t raise costs, they lower them
Just a quick note about a great post today from sustainability writer Marc Gunther. He reports on a conference on behavior and climate change. How
Stephen Dubner and Steven Levitt’s SuperFreakonomics has certainly gotten a lot of people worked up in short order. The point of contention is a chapter
What do Exelon, Pacific Gas & Electric, PNM Resources, Apple, and Nike all have in common? In the last month they all dropped out of
‘Is the World Better Off Because Your Company Is In It?’: Examining Corporate Climate Responsibility
