I’m Cold Today…So There’s No Global Warming
What do you call a group that uses large snowstorms to deride the scientific evidence for climate change? Fox News I guess. The absurdity of
February 11, 2010
2 Comments
What do you call a group that uses large snowstorms to deride the scientific evidence for climate change? Fox News I guess. The absurdity of
It’s been a couple months since the global climate negotiations in Copenhagen. Whether you’re a fan of a global cap on carbon emissions or not,
No matter what happens in Copenhagen, or in the follow up meetings in Mexico and elsewhere, the world is warming. It’s happening today, and even the majority of skeptics seem to agree on that point (often the debate is whether humans are behind it and how much money we should invest in “fixing” the problem). But the very real changes we’re already seeing are prompting many in the climate-watching world to talk about not just reductions in emissions but “adaptation.”
Happy New Year all (ok, I’m a bit delayed, but I entered the new year and promptly got really sick — lost over a week
The big global meeting wrapping up today in Copenhagen (called COP15) is all about reducing carbon emissions in order to combat climate change. But is
For some reason I can’t understand, Mr. Skeptical Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg keeps getting space in places like the Wall Street Journal and Time to peddle
Yesterday was a sad anniversary — it’s been 25 years since the Bhopal disaster raised the specter of chemicals and toxics as a deadly serious
The anger and energy of the climate skeptics is at a fever pitch lately. The breaking story that the Wall Street Journal loves so much
Stephen Dubner and Steven Levitt’s SuperFreakonomics has certainly gotten a lot of people worked up in short order. The point of contention is a chapter
[This post originally appeared on Harvard Business Online here] In recent months, which radical, tree-hugging group has upped the volume on pushing for action on